Florida eliminates the presumption of ‘Equal Timesharing’
NB. this article has been overtaken by events and new legislation – see https://sharedparenting.wordpress.com/2013/04/22/31/
In Florida, prior to 1997, courts failed to apply the presumption that ‘equal timesharing’ of child custody be equal and the starting point. Instead, they viewed equal timesharing’ as something to be ‘presumptively disfavoured’ (for cases see, for example; Ruffridge, 687 So.2d at 50, and Langford, 654 So.2d at 1238).
Other instances of being ‘presumptively disfavoured’ might be the state’s or court’s view on the (in)validity of marriage between same-sex couples, bigamy, polygamy etc.
This presumption against equal timesharing of custody appeared to be overturned when new legislation was enacted, i.e. Section 61.121. The post-1997, the Floridian legislation stated:
- “[t]he court may order rotating custody if the court finds that rotating custody will be in the best interest of the child.”
However, the courts in Florida persisted in going their own way – much like family courts in the UK after the Children Act of 1989 was passed.[1] Courts in Florida continued to apply the presumption against ‘rotating custody’. [2]
Then, in 2008, the legislature amended the statute concerning timesharing and specifically eliminated the presumption against equal timesharing. [3] Instead, the new legislation focuses on the indeterminable standard of ‘best interests of the child’ [4]
- (1) the age and maturity of the child
- (2) whether the child is school age
- (3) whether the parents lived near each other
- (4) whether the child preferred a rotating time share
- (5) whether the rotation would have a disruptive effect on the child
- (6) whether the times spent with each parent were reasonable
- (7) whether the division of the time share related reasonably to the child’s life, such as school year
- (8) whether there is animosity between the parents. [5]
‘Equal timesharing’ offers many benefits to a child of divorce. For example, when a child spends substantial time with each parent, the “custodial parent” is less likely, and less able, to use the child as a pawn or weapon against the other parent.
Equal timesharing also allows the child to have frequent and meaningful contact with both parents and allows both parents to make decisions affecting the child’s life such as academic and medical decisions.
Under the standard arrangement, where the child resides the majority of the time with one parent, it is that parent that typically makes all the decisions affecting the child’s life, often without communicating with the other parent.
Despite the change in law and the benefits of equal timesharing, the courts still disfavour equal timesharing. With today’s technology, such as Skype, it is much easier to spend time with the child without actually being present (also known in the UK as ‘indirect’ contact).
The court views these alternative means of timesharing (contact), to be less disruptive to the child. As a result, there must be a specific showing that equal timesharing is in the best interests of the child. But any court and any society that offers these as equivalents or alternatives insults the very dignity of fathers and deliberately cripples a child’s right to proper development and socialisation.
The 2008 change in the law eliminated the term “visitation” and replaced it with “timesharing.” In the European context this semantic change in Florida does not go far enough. In essence ‘equal timesharing’ is only an enhanced version of ‘contact’ and ‘visitation’ time / rights. There is precious little equal about it.
If timesharing is the ‘visitation schedule’ between the two parents and the child(ren), why not call it a parenting plan which is self-explanatory ?
Without further confirmation it looks as if Florida’s equal timesharing merely suggests – but does not guarantee – a greater quantum of time that a father can spend with his children.
This opinion is rammed home by the sub-notes that equal timesharing is not to be confused with parental responsibility (which is the authority to make decisions regarding the child’s day-today activities). ‘Parental responsibility’ is slowing be recognised as the ‘sop’ to the masses that it truly represents.
Not for the first time do we see family courts ignoring both the will of the people they serve and the written law.
- NB. The above is taken from “Florida Legislature Eliminates the Presumption against Equal Timesharing” http://www.owenbylaw.com/practice-areas/child-custody-and-support/presumption-against-equal-timesharing
[1] That is ignoring ‘shard residence’ for the most part.
[2] See Cooper v. Gress, 854 So.2d 262, 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
[3] The 2008 change in the law eliminated the term “visitation” and replaced it with “timesharing.” Timesharing is the visitation schedule between the two parents and the child(ren), not to be confused with parental responsibility, which is the authority to make decisions regarding the child’s day-today activities.
[4] That is, the impossibility to definitively determine and consistently
[5] See Bainbridge v. Pratt, 68 So.3d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
Dexter Mahadeo
October 17, 2012
It seems that discrimation against fathers is universal in the Western world. In Trinidad and Tobago we are now starting an association that we are hoping will change the way the Family Court implements Child Custody. We are hoping for some movement to shared parenting in practice http://www.sfatt.org I understand that Belgium is way ahead of the rest of the Western world in this respect. However, I cannot seem to get hold of the Beligium Co-parente laws especially as it is in French. Would like your views on this
rwhiston
October 17, 2012
Dexter,
You might find the following URLs of interest :
1. Belgians like their shared parenting laws
2. Belgium choses 50/50
3. Lawtext – French text of Belgian law on shared parenting
RW
Dexter Mahadeo
October 18, 2012
Thank you so very very much. Will take a look the the links. This would be so good in our work towards equality. Would it be OK to quote some text from your site on our site (www.sfatt.org) I will of course, but links to the source (your site). I could see it coming in very handy as we build our own content. It’s good to know we are not in this alone. We are very new to co/shared-parenting activism – less than a month to be exact – and the first of its kind here in Trinidad and Tobago. We still have to meet with our Assoc. of Psychologists, our Law Assoc., Religious and Women’s Rights groups, etc. to raise awareness. I have one other quick question: which, in your opinion, should be the better model to work towards the Australian model or the Beligian? I know this is a hard (and biased) question, but at least we want to have some foundation for our legisaltors here to work with. Getting changes intiated far less implemented is a battle in the Third World. Thanks Again
rwhiston
October 19, 2012
Dexter,
RE: . “Would it be OK to quote some text from your site on our site (www.sfatt.org)”
– Yes, of course it’s OK. My work is not copyrighted and is free to use (but not abuse or misquote) by anyone.
You can rely on the data as being ‘solid’ as I usually quote the actual author or goverment statistics.
Apart from Googling ‘Whiston’ also look for ‘Peter Tromp’, ‘FNF’ and ‘SPIG.’ All are good sources.
The groups you mention(Psychologists, Law Assoc., Religious and Women’s Rights groups), will be opposed to your concept in varying strengths and I would leave Women’s Rights to the last until you have experience in dealing with ‘vested interests’ who earn a living from the present regime. By that time you will hopefully have formed some sort of coalition or popular front with the others. Look at their ‘fundamantals’ and why they might oppose you.
If you have yet to meet with them then prepare in depth. Don’t breeze-in thinking you can wing it when you are there. Expect to be surprised and expect to be greeted with logic that makes no sense.
With regards which model, the Australian or the Beligian, go for Beligian as this gives more guarentees of residence and shared time. You will not get this in one leap but if you do make progress it will leave your close to the Australian system.
if I can give your asome advice it is to read more then you think you need to. Read yes about shared parenting but also read more widely. Read about child abuse levels and gender violnce. You will need this info to answer critics that will hope to sink you – and you need to be ready with a fast response or put-down.
By the way, there is a pan-european assoc for fathers (Platform for European Fathers) formed to influence legislation at the EU level. Looking into the future, would a similar cooperation / coalition be possible for you among the island states ?
I hope this helps.
RW
dmahadeo
October 19, 2012
Mr Whiston, you have been so very helpful. Thanks for all your suggestions. I know it will be a hard road ahead. I will be cognizant of all you mentioned as we work our way to justice. I know some of the facts about parental abuse i.e. biological mothers abuse children more than biological fathers, incest is rare between biological father and daughter, etc. We have had a lot of articles in the local paper within the last year l – burns beatings, etc. and I am trying to get prepared from that standpoint. I just have to put it in writing and research the actual cases. Getting Stats in the 3rd world is not as easy as there is very little research even though the are many committee and NGOs etc. feeding thier egos by father bashing and genral misandry. I am planning to approach our main University (The Univesity of the West Indies) Pscyh Research Centre to suggest work in this area. I have read Peter Tromp’s address paper “Benefits of post-divorced shared parenting…” that he presented in Greece 2009. It is excellent. I am trying to get group members to read it as well and have a link to it on our site (http://www.sfatt.org/index.php/benefits-of-post-divorce-shared-parenting/). Thank you again for being so frank and so supportive. With respect to forming an alliance among the other Caribbean island states. I think it’s a great suggestion and will put it to the group as a long term plan at tomorrow’s meeting. God bless you Mr. Whiston. You will definitely be hearing from me again soon. I hope I do not become a pest.
rwhiston
October 20, 2012
I forgot to mention there is an ‘equal parenting’ and a ‘shared parenting’ website available on WordPress.
rwhiston
January 2, 2013
Only too pleased to be of some little help. BTW it is not essential for ‘stats’ to be made avaialble in 2nd or 3rd world contires as we are dealing with the human condition and human reactions – and these know no geographical boundaries ! !
dmahadeo
October 20, 2012
Thanks, but already onto them and digging away 🙂 Have a great day!